smartphone: get expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mobile phone
Weight: 0.70
, ipad
Weight: 0.68
, web browser
Weight: 0.67
Siblings nokia
Weight: 0.70
, blackberry
Weight: 0.68
, android
Weight: 0.64
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.39
, cellular phone
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
get expensive 1.00
get more expensive 0.96
is expensive 0.94
be cheaper at buy 0.84
be cheaper at best buy 0.83
is cheaper 0.83
be more expensive than than tv 0.82
get exorbitantly expensive 0.80
be more expensive than laptops 0.80
be more expensive in uk 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(mobile phone, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(smartphone, get expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ipad, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(smartphone, get expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(ipad, be more expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(smartphone, get expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(smartphone, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(ipad, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(smartphone, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(smartphone, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(ipad, be more expensive in uk)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be more expensive in uk)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ipad, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(blackberry, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(nokia, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(mobile phone, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(smartphone, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(smartphone, get expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ipad, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(smartphone, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(smartphone, get expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(ipad, be more expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(smartphone, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(smartphone, get expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(smartphone, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(nokia, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(nokia, is expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(smartphone, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(blackberry, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(blackberry, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(smartphone, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(smartphone, get expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(smartphone, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(smartphone, get more expensive)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(smartphone, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(smartphone, get more expensive)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(smartphone, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(smartphone, is expensive)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(smartphone, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(smartphone, is expensive)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(smartphone, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(smartphone, get more expensive)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(smartphone, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(smartphone, is expensive)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(smartphone, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, get more expensive)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(smartphone, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(smartphone, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(smartphone, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(smartphone, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(smartphone, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(smartphone, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(smartphone, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, get expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(smartphone, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(smartphone, get expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ipad, be more expensive in uk)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ipad, is expensive)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(nokia, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(blackberry, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(smartphone, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ipad, is expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(smartphone, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(smartphone, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ipad, be more expensive in uk)