smartphone: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mobile phone
Weight: 0.70
, ipad
Weight: 0.68
, web browser
Weight: 0.67
Siblings nokia
Weight: 0.70
, blackberry
Weight: 0.68
, android
Weight: 0.64
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.39
, cellular phone
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
get expensive 0.94
get more expensive 0.90
is cheaper 0.85
be cheaper at buy 0.82
be cheaper at best buy 0.81
be more expensive than than tv 0.80
be more expensive than laptops 0.80
is pro more expensive 0.80
be more expensive in uk 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(mobile phone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(smartphone, is expensive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ipad, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(smartphone, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ipad, is pro more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(smartphone, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(ipad, be more expensive in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(smartphone, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(ipad, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(ipad, is pro more expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(ipad, be more expensive in uk)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be more expensive in uk)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ipad, is pro more expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ipad, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(blackberry, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(nokia, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(mobile phone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(smartphone, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ipad, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(smartphone, is expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ipad, is pro more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(smartphone, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(ipad, be more expensive in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(smartphone, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(nokia, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(nokia, is expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(blackberry, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(blackberry, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(smartphone, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(smartphone, get expensive)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(smartphone, get expensive)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(smartphone, get expensive)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(smartphone, get more expensive)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(smartphone, get more expensive)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(smartphone, get more expensive)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, get more expensive)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, get expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(smartphone, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ipad, be more expensive in uk)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ipad, is expensive)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is expensive)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(ipad, is pro more expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(nokia, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(blackberry, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ipad, is expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(ipad, is pro more expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ipad, be more expensive in uk)