smell: is sense tied

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.62
, sensation
Weight: 0.62
, odor
Weight: 0.61
, characteristic
Weight: 0.59
, time
Weight: 0.57
Siblings smoke
Weight: 0.65
, taste
Weight: 0.34
, mildew
Weight: 0.33
, bad breath
Weight: 0.33
, fart
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is sense tied 1.00
is sense tied to memory 0.91
is strongest sense tied 0.90
is strongest sense tied to memory 0.87
is sense linked 0.84
is sense 0.80
is important sense 0.80
be strongly tied to memory 0.80
is sense linked with memory 0.79
is most important sense 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(taste, is most important sense)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(taste, is important sense)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(taste, is sense)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(taste, is sense)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(taste, is sense)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(taste, is important sense)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(taste, is important sense)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(taste, is most important sense)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(smell, is sense tied)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(smell, is sense tied to memory)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(smell, is sense)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(smell, is strongest sense tied to memory)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(smell, is sense tied to memory)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(smell, is strongest sense tied)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(smell, be strongly tied to memory)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(smell, is strongest sense tied to memory)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(smell, be strongly tied to memory)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(smell, is sense tied to memory)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(smell, be strongly tied to memory)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(smell, is strongest sense tied)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(smell, is strongest sense tied to memory)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(smell, is sense)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(smell, is sense tied to memory)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(smell, is strongest sense tied)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(smell, is strongest sense tied to memory)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(smell, is important sense)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(smell, is strongest sense tied)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(smell, is sense)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(smell, be strongly tied to memory)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(smell, is most important sense)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(smell, is important sense)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(smell, is important sense)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(smell, is sense)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(smell, is most important sense)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(smell, is most important sense)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(smell, is important sense)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(smell, is most important sense)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(smell, is sense tied)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(smell, is sense tied)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(taste, is sense)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(taste, is important sense)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(smell, is sense tied)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(taste, is most important sense)