taste: is most important sense

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quality
Weight: 0.69
, trait
Weight: 0.66
, sensation
Weight: 0.65
, characteristic
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
Siblings flavor
Weight: 0.36
, smell
Weight: 0.34
, texture
Weight: 0.34
, passion
Weight: 0.33
, friendliness
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is most important sense 1.00
is important sense 0.95
is least important sense 0.92
is sense 0.91
is strongest sense 0.84
is sense linked 0.83
be strongest sense to memory 0.81
is strongest sense linked 0.81
is weakest sense 0.81
is strongest sense linked with memory 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(smell, be strongest sense to memory)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(smell, is strongest sense linked with memory)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(smell, is most important sense)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(smell, is strongest sense)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(smell, is important sense)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(smell, is least important sense)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(smell, is sense)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(smell, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(smell, is most important sense)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(smell, is important sense)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(smell, is important sense)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(smell, is sense)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(smell, is sense)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(smell, is least important sense)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(smell, is least important sense)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(smell, is strongest sense)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(smell, is strongest sense linked with memory)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(smell, is strongest sense linked with memory)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(smell, be strongest sense to memory)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(smell, be strongest sense to memory)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(taste, is most important sense)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(taste, is sense)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(taste, is important sense)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(taste, is sense)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(taste, is least important sense)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(taste, is least important sense)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(taste, is important sense)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(taste, is important sense)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(taste, is least important sense)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(taste, is weakest sense)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(taste, is weakest sense)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(taste, is weakest sense)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(taste, is sense)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(taste, is least important sense)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(taste, is important sense)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(taste, is weakest sense)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(taste, is sense)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(taste, is most important sense)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(taste, is most important sense)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(smell, is sense)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(smell, is least important sense)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(smell, is important sense)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(smell, is most important sense)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(smell, is strongest sense linked with memory)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(smell, is strongest sense)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(smell, be strongest sense to memory)