smell: is strongest sense

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.62
, sensation
Weight: 0.62
, odor
Weight: 0.61
, characteristic
Weight: 0.59
, time
Weight: 0.57
Siblings smoke
Weight: 0.65
, taste
Weight: 0.34
, mildew
Weight: 0.33
, bad breath
Weight: 0.33
, fart
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is strongest sense 1.00
is strongest sense linked 0.95
be strongest sense to memory 0.92
is strongest sense tied 0.92
is strongest sense linked with memory 0.89
is strongest sense tied to memory 0.88
is most important sense 0.84
is important sense 0.81
is least important sense 0.81
is sense 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(taste, is least important sense)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(taste, is most important sense)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(taste, is important sense)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(taste, is sense)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(taste, is sense)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(taste, is sense)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(taste, is important sense)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(taste, is important sense)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(taste, is most important sense)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(taste, is most important sense)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(taste, is least important sense)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(taste, is least important sense)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(smell, is strongest sense)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(smell, be strongest sense to memory)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(smell, be strongest sense to memory)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(smell, is strongest sense tied to memory)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(smell, is sense)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(smell, is strongest sense tied)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(smell, is strongest sense tied to memory)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(smell, is strongest sense linked with memory)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(smell, be strongest sense to memory)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(smell, is least important sense)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(smell, is strongest sense linked with memory)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(smell, is strongest sense linked with memory)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(smell, is strongest sense tied)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(smell, is strongest sense tied to memory)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(smell, is strongest sense linked with memory)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(smell, is sense)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(smell, is strongest sense tied)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(smell, be strongest sense to memory)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(smell, is important sense)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(smell, is strongest sense tied to memory)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(smell, is strongest sense tied)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(smell, is least important sense)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(smell, is most important sense)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(smell, is sense)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(smell, is most important sense)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(smell, is important sense)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(smell, is important sense)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(smell, is most important sense)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(smell, is least important sense)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(smell, is sense)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(smell, is least important sense)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(smell, is most important sense)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(smell, is important sense)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(smell, is strongest sense)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(smell, is strongest sense)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(taste, is sense)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(taste, is important sense)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(taste, is least important sense)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(smell, is strongest sense)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(taste, is most important sense)