taste: is sense

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quality
Weight: 0.69
, trait
Weight: 0.66
, sensation
Weight: 0.65
, characteristic
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
Siblings flavor
Weight: 0.36
, smell
Weight: 0.34
, texture
Weight: 0.34
, passion
Weight: 0.33
, friendliness
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is sense 1.00
is important sense 0.96
is most important sense 0.91
is least important sense 0.89
is sense linked 0.86
is chemical sense 0.85
is sense tied 0.80
is strongest sense 0.80
is sense linked with memory 0.79
be referred as chemical sense 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(taste, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(smell, is strongest sense)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(taste, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(smell, is sense tied)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(taste, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(smell, is most important sense)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(taste, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(smell, be referred as chemical sense)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(taste, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(smell, is chemical sense)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(taste, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(smell, is important sense)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(taste, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(smell, is least important sense)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(taste, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(smell, is sense)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(taste, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(smell, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(smell, is sense)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(taste, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(smell, is important sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(smell, is important sense)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(taste, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(smell, is least important sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(smell, is least important sense)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(taste, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(smell, is most important sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(smell, is most important sense)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(taste, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(smell, is chemical sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(smell, is chemical sense)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(taste, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(smell, be referred as chemical sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(smell, be referred as chemical sense)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(taste, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(smell, is sense tied) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(smell, is sense tied)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(taste, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(smell, is strongest sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(smell, is strongest sense)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(taste, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(taste, is sense)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(taste, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(taste, is important sense)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(taste, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(taste, is most important sense)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(taste, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(taste, is least important sense)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(taste, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(taste, is important sense)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(taste, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(taste, is least important sense)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(taste, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(taste, is important sense)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(taste, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(taste, is important sense)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(taste, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(taste, is least important sense)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(taste, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(taste, is most important sense)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(taste, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(taste, is most important sense)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(taste, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(taste, is least important sense)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(taste, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(taste, is most important sense)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(taste, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(taste, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(taste, is sense)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(taste, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(taste, is sense)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(taste, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(smell, is sense)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(taste, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(smell, is least important sense)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(taste, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(smell, is chemical sense)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(taste, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(smell, is important sense)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(taste, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(smell, be referred as chemical sense)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(taste, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(smell, is most important sense)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(taste, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(smell, is strongest sense)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(taste, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(smell, is sense tied)