snacks: be sold for cheap

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.52
, restaurant
Weight: 0.39
, beverage
Weight: 0.38
, section
Weight: 0.33
, time
Weight: 0.32
Siblings snack
Weight: 0.35
, soda
Weight: 0.34
, canned food
Weight: 0.33
, popcorn
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be sold for cheap 1.00
be sold for cheap at dollar stores 0.89
is buy 0.82
is expensive 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(snacks, be sold for cheap)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(snacks, be sold for cheap)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(snacks, be sold for cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(item, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(snacks, be sold for cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(restaurant, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(snacks, be sold for cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(snacks, be sold for cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(item, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(snacks, be sold for cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(snacks, be sold for cheap)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(snacks, be sold for cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(snacks, be sold for cheap)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(snacks, be sold for cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(snacks, be sold for cheap)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(snacks, be sold for cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(snacks, be sold for cheap at dollar stores)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(snacks, be sold for cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(snacks, be sold for cheap at dollar stores)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(snacks, be sold for cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(snacks, be sold for cheap at dollar stores)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(snacks, be sold for cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(snacks, be sold for cheap at dollar stores)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(snacks, be sold for cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(snacks, is buy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(snacks, be sold for cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(snacks, is buy)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(snacks, be sold for cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(snacks, is expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(snacks, be sold for cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(snacks, is buy)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(snacks, be sold for cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(snacks, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(snacks, be sold for cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(snacks, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(snacks, be sold for cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(snacks, is buy)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(snacks, be sold for cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(snacks, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(snacks, be sold for cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(snacks, be sold for cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(snacks, be sold for cheap)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(snacks, be sold for cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(snacks, be sold for cheap)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(snacks, be sold for cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(snacks, be sold for cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(restaurant, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(snacks, be sold for cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(snacks, be sold for cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(restaurant, is expensive)