snacks: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.52
, restaurant
Weight: 0.39
, beverage
Weight: 0.38
, section
Weight: 0.33
, time
Weight: 0.32
Siblings snack
Weight: 0.35
, soda
Weight: 0.34
, canned food
Weight: 0.33
, popcorn
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
be at movies expensive 0.81
be expensive at movies 0.81
be sold for cheap 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(snacks, is expensive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(snacks, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(snacks, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(item, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(snacks, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(restaurant, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(snacks, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(snacks, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(item, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(snacks, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(snacks, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(snacks, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(snacks, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(snacks, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(snacks, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(snacks, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(snacks, be at movies expensive)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(snacks, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(snacks, be expensive at movies)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(snacks, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(snacks, be at movies expensive)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(snacks, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(snacks, be expensive at movies)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(snacks, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(snacks, be at movies expensive)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(snacks, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(snacks, be expensive at movies)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(snacks, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(snacks, be expensive at movies)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(snacks, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(snacks, be at movies expensive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(snacks, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(snacks, be sold for cheap)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(snacks, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(snacks, be sold for cheap)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(snacks, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(snacks, be sold for cheap)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(snacks, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(snacks, be sold for cheap)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(snacks, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(snacks, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(snacks, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(snacks, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(snacks, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(snacks, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(snacks, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(restaurant, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(snacks, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(snacks, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(restaurant, is expensive)