snacks: be expensive at movies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.52
, restaurant
Weight: 0.39
, beverage
Weight: 0.38
, section
Weight: 0.33
, time
Weight: 0.32
Siblings snack
Weight: 0.35
, soda
Weight: 0.34
, canned food
Weight: 0.33
, popcorn
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at movies expensive 1.00
be expensive at movies 1.00
be at movies 0.94
cost at movies 0.92
is expensive 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(restaurant, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(snacks, be expensive at movies)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(snacks, be expensive at movies)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(snacks, be expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(item, is expensive)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(snacks, be expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(restaurant, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(snacks, be expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, is expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(snacks, be expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(item, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(restaurant, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(snacks, be expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(snacks, be expensive at movies)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(snacks, be expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(snacks, be expensive at movies)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(snacks, be expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(snacks, be expensive at movies)

Similarity expansion

0.85
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(snacks, be expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(snacks, be at movies expensive)
0.85
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(snacks, be expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(snacks, be at movies expensive)
0.85
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(snacks, be expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(snacks, be at movies expensive)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(snacks, be expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(snacks, be at movies)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(snacks, be expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(snacks, be at movies)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(snacks, be expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(snacks, be at movies)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(snacks, be expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(snacks, cost at movies)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(snacks, be expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(snacks, cost at movies)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(snacks, be expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(snacks, cost at movies)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(snacks, be expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(snacks, be at movies expensive)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(snacks, be expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(snacks, be at movies)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(snacks, be expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(snacks, cost at movies)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(snacks, be expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(snacks, is expensive)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(snacks, be expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(snacks, is expensive)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(snacks, be expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(snacks, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(snacks, be expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(snacks, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(snacks, be expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(snacks, be expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(snacks, be expensive at movies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(snacks, be expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(snacks, be expensive at movies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(snacks, be expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(snacks, be expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(restaurant, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(snacks, be expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(snacks, be expensive at movies)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(restaurant, is expensive)