snacks: be at movies expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.52
, restaurant
Weight: 0.39
, beverage
Weight: 0.38
, section
Weight: 0.33
, time
Weight: 0.32
Siblings snack
Weight: 0.35
, soda
Weight: 0.34
, canned food
Weight: 0.33
, popcorn
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at movies expensive 1.00
be expensive at movies 1.00
be at movies 0.94
cost at movies 0.92
is expensive 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(restaurant, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(snacks, be at movies expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(snacks, be at movies expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(snacks, be at movies expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(item, is expensive)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(snacks, be at movies expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(restaurant, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(snacks, be at movies expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, is expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(snacks, be at movies expensive)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(item, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(restaurant, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(snacks, be at movies expensive)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(snacks, be at movies expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(snacks, be at movies expensive)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(snacks, be at movies expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(snacks, be at movies expensive)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(snacks, be at movies expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.85
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(snacks, be at movies expensive)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(snacks, be expensive at movies)
0.85
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(snacks, be at movies expensive)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(snacks, be expensive at movies)
0.85
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(snacks, be at movies expensive)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(snacks, be expensive at movies)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(snacks, be at movies expensive)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(snacks, be at movies)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(snacks, be at movies expensive)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(snacks, be at movies)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(snacks, be at movies expensive)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(snacks, be at movies)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(snacks, be at movies expensive)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(snacks, cost at movies)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(snacks, be at movies expensive)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(snacks, cost at movies)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(snacks, be at movies expensive)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(snacks, cost at movies)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(snacks, be at movies expensive)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(snacks, be expensive at movies)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(snacks, be at movies expensive)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(snacks, be at movies)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(snacks, be at movies expensive)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(snacks, cost at movies)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(snacks, be at movies expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(snacks, is expensive)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(snacks, be at movies expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(snacks, is expensive)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(snacks, be at movies expensive)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(snacks, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(snacks, be at movies expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(snacks, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(snacks, be at movies expensive)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(snacks, be at movies expensive)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(snacks, be at movies expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(snacks, be at movies expensive)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(snacks, be at movies expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(snacks, be at movies expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(snacks, be at movies expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(restaurant, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(snacks, be at movies expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(snacks, be at movies expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(restaurant, is expensive)