snacks: cost at movies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.52
, restaurant
Weight: 0.39
, beverage
Weight: 0.38
, section
Weight: 0.33
, time
Weight: 0.32
Siblings snack
Weight: 0.35
, soda
Weight: 0.34
, canned food
Weight: 0.33
, popcorn
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
cost at movies 1.00
be at movies expensive 0.92
be expensive at movies 0.92
be at movies 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(snacks, cost at movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(snacks, cost at movies)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(snacks, cost at movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(snacks, be at movies expensive)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(snacks, cost at movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(snacks, be expensive at movies)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(snacks, cost at movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(snacks, be at movies expensive)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(snacks, cost at movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(snacks, be expensive at movies)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(snacks, cost at movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(snacks, be at movies expensive)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(snacks, cost at movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(snacks, be expensive at movies)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(snacks, cost at movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(snacks, be at movies)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(snacks, cost at movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(snacks, be at movies)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(snacks, cost at movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(snacks, be at movies)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(snacks, cost at movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(snacks, be expensive at movies)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(snacks, cost at movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(snacks, be at movies expensive)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(snacks, cost at movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(snacks, be at movies)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(snacks, cost at movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(snacks, cost at movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(snacks, cost at movies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(snacks, cost at movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(snacks, cost at movies)