snow leopard: need protected

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents leopard
Weight: 0.70
, species
Weight: 0.68
, animal
Weight: 0.67
, carnivore
Weight: 0.67
Siblings snowy owl
Weight: 0.37
, snow goose
Weight: 0.37
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.37
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.37
, cougar
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
need protected 1.00
be protected 0.96
is protected 0.96
need protection 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(species, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(snow leopard, need protected)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(species, be protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(snow leopard, need protected)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(species, is protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(snow leopard, need protected)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(snow leopard, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(species, is protected)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(snow leopard, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(species, need protected)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(snow leopard, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(species, be protected)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(snow leopard, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(species, be protected)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(snow leopard, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(species, need protected)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(snow leopard, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(species, is protected)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(snow leopard, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(grizzly bear, is protected)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(snow leopard, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(grizzly bear, need protected)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(species, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(snow leopard, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(snow leopard, need protected)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(species, be protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(snow leopard, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(snow leopard, need protected)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(species, is protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(snow leopard, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(snow leopard, need protected)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(snow leopard, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(grizzly bear, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(grizzly bear, need protected)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(snow leopard, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(grizzly bear, is protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(grizzly bear, is protected)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(snow leopard, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(snow leopard, need protected)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(snow leopard, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(snow leopard, be protected)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(snow leopard, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(snow leopard, is protected)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(snow leopard, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(snow leopard, is protected)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(snow leopard, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(snow leopard, be protected)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(snow leopard, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(snow leopard, is protected)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(snow leopard, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(snow leopard, is protected)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(snow leopard, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(snow leopard, be protected)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(snow leopard, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(snow leopard, need protection)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(snow leopard, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(snow leopard, need protection)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(snow leopard, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(snow leopard, be protected)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(snow leopard, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(snow leopard, need protection)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(snow leopard, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(snow leopard, need protection)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(snow leopard, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(snow leopard, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(snow leopard, need protected)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(snow leopard, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(snow leopard, need protected)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(snow leopard, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(species, is protected)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(snow leopard, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(species, be protected)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(snow leopard, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(species, need protected)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(snow leopard, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(grizzly bear, need protected)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(snow leopard, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(grizzly bear, is protected)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(snow leopard, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(species, is protected)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(snow leopard, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(species, need protected)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(snow leopard, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(species, be protected)