sonar: affect marines mammals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.62
, equipment
Weight: 0.59
, method
Weight: 0.57
, tool
Weight: 0.56
, field
Weight: 0.55
Siblings smoke detector
Weight: 0.34
, galvanometer
Weight: 0.33
, ultrasound
Weight: 0.33
, electronic device
Weight: 0.33
, cooling device
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect marines mammals 1.00
kill marine mammals 0.86
kill mammals 0.85
affect humans 0.79
kill whales 0.77
be useful for dolphins 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(field, affect humans)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(sonar, affect marines mammals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(sonar, affect marines mammals)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(field, affect humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(sonar, affect marines mammals)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(field, affect humans)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(field, affect humans)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(sonar, affect marines mammals)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(sonar, affect marines mammals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(sonar, affect marines mammals)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(sonar, affect marines mammals)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(sonar, affect marines mammals)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sonar, kill marine mammals)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(sonar, affect marines mammals)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(sonar, kill mammals)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(sonar, affect marines mammals)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sonar, kill mammals)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(sonar, affect marines mammals)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(sonar, kill marine mammals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(sonar, affect marines mammals)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(sonar, kill mammals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(sonar, affect marines mammals)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(sonar, kill marine mammals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(sonar, affect marines mammals)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(sonar, kill whales)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(sonar, affect marines mammals)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(sonar, kill whales)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(sonar, affect marines mammals)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(sonar, be useful for dolphins)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(sonar, affect marines mammals)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(sonar, be useful for dolphins)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(sonar, affect marines mammals)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(sonar, kill whales)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(sonar, affect marines mammals)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(sonar, be useful for dolphins)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(sonar, affect marines mammals)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(sonar, kill mammals)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(sonar, affect marines mammals)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(sonar, kill marine mammals)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(sonar, affect marines mammals)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(sonar, be useful for dolphins)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(sonar, affect marines mammals)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(sonar, kill whales)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(sonar, affect marines mammals)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(sonar, affect marines mammals)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(sonar, affect marines mammals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(sonar, affect marines mammals)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(sonar, affect marines mammals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(sonar, affect marines mammals)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(field, affect humans)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(sonar, affect marines mammals)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(field, affect humans)