sonar: kill marine mammals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.62
, equipment
Weight: 0.59
, method
Weight: 0.57
, tool
Weight: 0.56
, field
Weight: 0.55
Siblings smoke detector
Weight: 0.34
, galvanometer
Weight: 0.33
, ultrasound
Weight: 0.33
, electronic device
Weight: 0.33
, cooling device
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
kill marine mammals 1.00
kill mammals 0.94
affect marines mammals 0.86
kill whales 0.85
be put on whales 0.78
be useful for dolphins 0.78
be put on blue whales 0.77
be important to animals 0.75
affect humans 0.75
be for humans 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(field, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(sonar, kill marine mammals)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(field, affect humans)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(sonar, kill marine mammals)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(device, be put on blue whales)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(sonar, kill marine mammals)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(device, be put on whales)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(sonar, kill marine mammals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(device, be put on whales)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(device, be put on blue whales)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(field, affect humans)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(field, be important to animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(device, be put on whales)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(device, be put on blue whales)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(field, be important to animals)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(field, affect humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cooling device, be for humans)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(field, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(sonar, kill marine mammals)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(field, affect humans)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(sonar, kill marine mammals)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(device, be put on blue whales)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(sonar, kill marine mammals)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(device, be put on whales)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(sonar, kill marine mammals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(cooling device, be for humans)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(cooling device, be for humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(sonar, kill marine mammals)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(sonar, kill mammals)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(sonar, kill whales)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(sonar, affect marines mammals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(sonar, kill mammals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(sonar, kill mammals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(sonar, affect marines mammals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sonar, kill mammals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(sonar, be useful for dolphins)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(sonar, kill whales)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(sonar, kill whales)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(sonar, kill whales)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(sonar, be useful for dolphins)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(sonar, be useful for dolphins)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(sonar, be useful for dolphins)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(sonar, affect marines mammals)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(sonar, affect marines mammals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sonar, kill marine mammals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(sonar, kill marine mammals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(device, be put on whales)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(field, affect humans)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(device, be put on blue whales)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(field, be important to animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(cooling device, be for humans)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(device, be put on whales)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(field, affect humans)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(device, be put on blue whales)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(sonar, kill marine mammals)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(field, be important to animals)