sonar: kill mammals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.62
, equipment
Weight: 0.59
, method
Weight: 0.57
, tool
Weight: 0.56
, field
Weight: 0.55
Siblings smoke detector
Weight: 0.34
, galvanometer
Weight: 0.33
, ultrasound
Weight: 0.33
, electronic device
Weight: 0.33
, cooling device
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
kill mammals 1.00
kill marine mammals 0.94
kill whales 0.85
affect marines mammals 0.85
be for humans 0.79
affect humans 0.79
was important to humans 0.77
be important to animals 0.76
be put on whales 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tool, was important to humans)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(sonar, kill mammals)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(field, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(sonar, kill mammals)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(field, affect humans)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(sonar, kill mammals)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(device, be put on whales)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(sonar, kill mammals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sonar, kill mammals)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(device, be put on whales)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sonar, kill mammals)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(field, affect humans)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sonar, kill mammals)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(field, be important to animals)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sonar, kill mammals)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(tool, was important to humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sonar, kill mammals)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(device, be put on whales)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sonar, kill mammals)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tool, was important to humans)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sonar, kill mammals)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(field, affect humans)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sonar, kill mammals)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(field, be important to animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sonar, kill mammals)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cooling device, be for humans)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tool, was important to humans)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(sonar, kill mammals)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(sonar, kill mammals)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(field, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(sonar, kill mammals)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(sonar, kill mammals)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(field, affect humans)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(sonar, kill mammals)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(sonar, kill mammals)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(device, be put on whales)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(sonar, kill mammals)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(sonar, kill mammals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sonar, kill mammals)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(cooling device, be for humans)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(cooling device, be for humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sonar, kill mammals)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(sonar, kill mammals)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(sonar, kill mammals)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sonar, kill marine mammals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(sonar, kill mammals)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(sonar, affect marines mammals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(sonar, kill mammals)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(sonar, kill whales)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(sonar, kill mammals)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(sonar, kill marine mammals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(sonar, kill mammals)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(sonar, kill marine mammals)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(sonar, kill mammals)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(sonar, kill whales)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(sonar, kill mammals)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(sonar, kill whales)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sonar, kill mammals)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(sonar, kill whales)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sonar, kill mammals)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(sonar, kill marine mammals)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(sonar, kill mammals)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(sonar, affect marines mammals)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sonar, kill mammals)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(sonar, affect marines mammals)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(sonar, kill mammals)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(sonar, affect marines mammals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(sonar, kill mammals)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(sonar, kill mammals)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sonar, kill mammals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sonar, kill mammals)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(sonar, kill mammals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sonar, kill mammals)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(field, affect humans)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sonar, kill mammals)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(device, be put on whales)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sonar, kill mammals)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(field, be important to animals)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sonar, kill mammals)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tool, was important to humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sonar, kill mammals)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(cooling device, be for humans)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(sonar, kill mammals)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(field, affect humans)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(sonar, kill mammals)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(device, be put on whales)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(sonar, kill mammals)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(field, be important to animals)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(sonar, kill mammals)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tool, was important to humans)