sony: is is continually hacked

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dvd player
Weight: 0.67
, electronics
Weight: 0.63
, corporation
Weight: 0.60
, giant
Weight: 0.59
, client
Weight: 0.59
Siblings sega
Weight: 0.46
, xbox
Weight: 0.37
, cd player
Weight: 0.36
, samsung
Weight: 0.35
, dvd
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is is continually hacked 1.00
keep hacked 0.92
being is hacked 0.91
get hacked 0.90
getting hacked 0.89
consistently is target of hackers 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(sony, is is continually hacked)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(sony, is is continually hacked)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(sony, is is continually hacked)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sony, keep hacked)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(sony, is is continually hacked)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(sony, keep hacked)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(sony, is is continually hacked)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(sony, get hacked)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(sony, is is continually hacked)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(sony, keep hacked)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(sony, is is continually hacked)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(sony, keep hacked)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(sony, is is continually hacked)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(sony, get hacked)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(sony, is is continually hacked)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(sony, get hacked)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(sony, is is continually hacked)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(sony, get hacked)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(sony, is is continually hacked)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(sony, getting hacked)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(sony, is is continually hacked)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sony, being is hacked)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(sony, is is continually hacked)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(sony, being is hacked)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(sony, is is continually hacked)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(sony, getting hacked)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(sony, is is continually hacked)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(sony, being is hacked)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(sony, is is continually hacked)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sony, getting hacked)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(sony, is is continually hacked)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sony, consistently is target of hackers)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(sony, is is continually hacked)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(sony, being is hacked)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(sony, is is continually hacked)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(sony, getting hacked)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(sony, is is continually hacked)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(sony, consistently is target of hackers)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(sony, is is continually hacked)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(sony, consistently is target of hackers)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(sony, is is continually hacked)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(sony, consistently is target of hackers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(sony, is is continually hacked)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(sony, is is continually hacked)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sony, is is continually hacked)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(sony, is is continually hacked)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(sony, is is continually hacked)