sony: keep hacked

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dvd player
Weight: 0.67
, electronics
Weight: 0.63
, corporation
Weight: 0.60
, giant
Weight: 0.59
, client
Weight: 0.59
Siblings sega
Weight: 0.46
, xbox
Weight: 0.37
, cd player
Weight: 0.36
, samsung
Weight: 0.35
, dvd
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
keep hacked 1.00
get hacked 0.97
getting hacked 0.95
being is hacked 0.94
is is continually hacked 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(sony, keep hacked)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(sony, keep hacked)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(sony, keep hacked)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(sony, get hacked)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(sony, keep hacked)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(sony, get hacked)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(sony, keep hacked)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sony, is is continually hacked)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(sony, keep hacked)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(sony, get hacked)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(sony, keep hacked)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(sony, get hacked)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(sony, keep hacked)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(sony, is is continually hacked)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(sony, keep hacked)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(sony, being is hacked)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(sony, keep hacked)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(sony, getting hacked)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(sony, keep hacked)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sony, getting hacked)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(sony, keep hacked)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(sony, is is continually hacked)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(sony, keep hacked)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(sony, is is continually hacked)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(sony, keep hacked)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sony, being is hacked)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(sony, keep hacked)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(sony, getting hacked)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(sony, keep hacked)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(sony, getting hacked)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(sony, keep hacked)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(sony, being is hacked)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(sony, keep hacked)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(sony, being is hacked)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(sony, keep hacked)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sony, keep hacked)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(sony, keep hacked)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(sony, keep hacked)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sony, keep hacked)