spam: be popular in korea

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, risk
Weight: 0.55
, item
Weight: 0.54
Siblings junk mail
Weight: 0.33
, business activity
Weight: 0.33
, mail
Weight: 0.32
, trojan
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be popular in korea 1.00
be popular in south korea 0.95
be expensive in korea 0.94
be popular in asia 0.83
be bloody popular in hawaii 0.75
be popular in guam 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(spam, be popular in korea)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(spam, be popular in korea)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(spam, be popular in korea)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(spam, be expensive in korea)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(spam, be popular in korea)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(spam, be expensive in korea)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(spam, be popular in korea)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(spam, be popular in south korea)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(spam, be popular in korea)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(spam, be expensive in korea)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(spam, be popular in korea)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(spam, be popular in south korea)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(spam, be popular in korea)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(spam, be popular in south korea)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(spam, be popular in korea)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(spam, be popular in south korea)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(spam, be popular in korea)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(spam, be expensive in korea)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(spam, be popular in korea)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(spam, be popular in asia)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(spam, be popular in korea)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(spam, be popular in asia)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(spam, be popular in korea)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(spam, be popular in asia)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(spam, be popular in korea)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(spam, be popular in guam)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(spam, be popular in korea)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(spam, be popular in guam)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(spam, be popular in korea)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(spam, be popular in guam)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(spam, be popular in korea)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(spam, be popular in asia)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(spam, be popular in korea)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(spam, be popular in korea)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(spam, be popular in korea)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(spam, be popular in korea)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(spam, be popular in korea)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(spam, be popular in guam)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(spam, be popular in korea)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(spam, be popular in korea)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(spam, be popular in korea)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(spam, be popular in korea)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(spam, be popular in korea)