spending: be for economy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.66
, bill
Weight: 0.58
, behavior
Weight: 0.58
, policy
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.57
Siblings business activity
Weight: 0.35
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.34
, dollar bill
Weight: 0.33
, consumption
Weight: 0.33
, appropriation
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for economy 1.00
be good for economy 0.96
help economy 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(spending, be for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(consumption, be good for economy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(spending, be for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(consumption, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(consumption, be good for economy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(spending, be for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(spending, be for economy)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(spending, be for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(spending, help economy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(spending, be for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(spending, be good for economy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(spending, be for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(spending, help economy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(spending, be for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(spending, be good for economy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(spending, be for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(spending, help economy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(spending, be for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(spending, be good for economy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(spending, be for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(spending, be good for economy)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(spending, be for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(spending, help economy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(spending, be for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(spending, be for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(spending, be for economy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(spending, be for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(spending, be for economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(spending, be for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(consumption, be good for economy)