spice: were important in europe

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents seasoning
Weight: 0.65
, staple
Weight: 0.62
, ingredient
Weight: 0.60
, brand
Weight: 0.60
Siblings fennel
Weight: 0.72
, mustard seed
Weight: 0.71
, black pepper
Weight: 0.70
, saffron
Weight: 0.70
, allspice
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
were important in europe 1.00
were expensive in europe 0.95
were important part of european life 0.88
were important to europeans 0.86
were expensive for europeans 0.84
were such valued commodity in europe 0.82
be important to india 0.81
be expensive in uk 0.77
be cheap in thailand 0.77
were important in 1450 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(spice, were important in europe)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(saffron, be expensive in uk)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(spice, were important in europe)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(saffron, be cheap in thailand)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(spice, were important in europe)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(saffron, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(saffron, be expensive in uk)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(spice, were important in europe)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(saffron, be cheap in thailand)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(saffron, be cheap in thailand)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(spice, were important in europe)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(spice, were important in europe)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(spice, were important in europe)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(spice, were important part of european life)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(spice, were important in europe)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(spice, were expensive for europeans)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(spice, were important in europe)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(spice, were expensive for europeans)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(spice, were important in europe)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(spice, were expensive for europeans)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(spice, were important in europe)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(spice, were important to europeans)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(spice, were important in europe)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(spice, were expensive for europeans)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(spice, were important in europe)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(spice, were such valued commodity in europe)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(spice, were important in europe)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(spice, were important to europeans)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(spice, were important in europe)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(spice, were important part of european life)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(spice, were important in europe)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(spice, be important to india)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(spice, were important in europe)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(spice, were important to europeans)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(spice, were important in europe)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(spice, were such valued commodity in europe)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(spice, were important in europe)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(spice, were important part of european life)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(spice, were important in europe)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(spice, were such valued commodity in europe)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(spice, were important in europe)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(spice, be important to india)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(spice, were important in europe)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(spice, be important to india)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(spice, were important in europe)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(spice, were important in 1450)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(spice, were important in europe)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(spice, were important to europeans)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(spice, were important in europe)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(spice, were important in 1450)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(spice, were important in europe)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(spice, were important in 1450)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(spice, were important in europe)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(spice, be important to india)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(spice, were important in europe)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(spice, were such valued commodity in europe)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(spice, were important in europe)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(spice, were important part of european life)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(spice, were important in europe)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(spice, were important in 1450)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(spice, were important in europe)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(spice, were important in europe)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(spice, were important in europe)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(spice, were important in europe)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(spice, were important in europe)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(spice, were important in europe)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(saffron, be expensive in uk)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(spice, were important in europe)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(saffron, be cheap in thailand)