spinach: be good for eyes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fresh fruit
Weight: 0.67
, flavor
Weight: 0.65
, vegetable
Weight: 0.63
, food
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.61
Siblings tomato sauce
Weight: 0.37
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.37
, tomato
Weight: 0.37
, broccoli
Weight: 0.37
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for eyes 1.00
be good for us 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tomato, be good for us)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(spinach, be good for eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(tomato, be good for us)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(spinach, be good for eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(spinach, be good for eyes)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(spinach, be good for eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(spinach, be good for us)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(spinach, be good for eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(spinach, be good for us)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(spinach, be good for eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(spinach, be good for us)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(spinach, be good for eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for us)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(spinach, be good for eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(spinach, be good for eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for eyes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(spinach, be good for eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(spinach, be good for eyes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(tomato, be good for us)