spinach: be good for us

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fresh fruit
Weight: 0.67
, flavor
Weight: 0.65
, vegetable
Weight: 0.63
, food
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.61
Siblings tomato sauce
Weight: 0.37
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.37
, tomato
Weight: 0.37
, broccoli
Weight: 0.37
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for us 1.00
come out whole 0.82
has quality good 0.80
be good for eyes 0.79
be good for dogs 0.78
go quickly bad 0.77
go fast bad 0.77
be good for babies 0.76
has quality bad 0.75
be bad for dogs 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(spinach, be good for us)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(spinach, be good for us)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(vegetable, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(spinach, be good for us)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(flavor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(spinach, be good for us)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(flavor, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(vegetable, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(food, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(flavor, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(broccoli, go quickly bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, be bad for dogs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(cauliflower, be bad for dogs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(broccoli, be bad for dogs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(tomato, be bad for dogs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(broccoli, be good for dogs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(cauliflower, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tomato, be good for us)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fruit salad, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(tomato, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(broccoli, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cauliflower, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(spinach, be good for us)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(vegetable, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(spinach, be good for us)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(spinach, be good for us)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(flavor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(spinach, be good for us)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(tomato, be good for us)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(broccoli, go quickly bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(broccoli, go quickly bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(cauliflower, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cauliflower, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(broccoli, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(broccoli, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(fruit salad, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(tomato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(tomato, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(tomato sauce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(tomato sauce, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, be bad for dogs)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(cauliflower, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(cauliflower, be bad for dogs)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(broccoli, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(broccoli, be bad for dogs)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(broccoli, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(broccoli, be good for dogs)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(tomato, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(tomato, be bad for dogs)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(cauliflower, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(cauliflower, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(spinach, be good for us)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(spinach, come out whole)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(spinach, go quickly bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(spinach, come out whole)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(spinach, be good for dogs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(spinach, go quickly bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(spinach, go quickly bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(spinach, come out whole)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(spinach, be good for babies)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(spinach, be bad for dogs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(spinach, be good for eyes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(spinach, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(spinach, be bad for dogs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be bad for dogs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(spinach, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(spinach, go quickly bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for babies)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(spinach, be good for babies)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for dogs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(spinach, be good for dogs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(spinach, be good for dogs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(spinach, be good for eyes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(spinach, be bad for dogs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(spinach, be good for babies)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(spinach, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(spinach, be good for eyes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(spinach, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(spinach, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(spinach, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(spinach, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(spinach, come out whole)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for eyes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(spinach, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for us)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(spinach, be good for us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(flavor, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(vegetable, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(broccoli, go quickly bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, be bad for dogs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(cauliflower, be bad for dogs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(broccoli, be bad for dogs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(tomato, be bad for dogs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(broccoli, be good for dogs)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(tomato, be good for us)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cauliflower, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(fruit salad, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(broccoli, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cauliflower, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tomato, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(flavor, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(vegetable, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(spinach, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)