sponge: be classified as animal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organism
Weight: 0.68
, object
Weight: 0.64
, material
Weight: 0.63
, creature
Weight: 0.62
Siblings yeast
Weight: 0.35
, starfish
Weight: 0.34
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.34
, giant squid
Weight: 0.34
, amoeba
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be classified as animal 1.00
be classified as animals 0.96
classified as animals 0.95
be considered animal 0.89
be considered as form of animal 0.88
be considered as animals 0.87
is animal 0.86
be known as animals 0.86
be considered animals 0.84
be considered complex animal 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(organism, is animal)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(sponge, be classified as animal)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sponge, be classified as animal)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(organism, is animal)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be classified as animal)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(organism, is animal)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be classified as animal)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(amoeba, be considered animals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(organism, is animal)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(sponge, be classified as animal)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(sponge, be classified as animal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sponge, be classified as animal)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(amoeba, be considered animals)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(amoeba, be considered animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sponge, be classified as animal)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(sponge, be classified as animal)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(sponge, be classified as animal)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(sponge, be classified as animals)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(sponge, be classified as animal)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(sponge, is animal)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(sponge, be classified as animal)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(sponge, be considered animal)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(sponge, be classified as animal)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be classified as animals)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(sponge, be classified as animal)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(sponge, be considered animal)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sponge, be classified as animal)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(sponge, be considered animal)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sponge, be classified as animal)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(sponge, is animal)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(sponge, be classified as animal)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(sponge, is animal)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sponge, be classified as animal)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(sponge, be classified as animals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(sponge, be classified as animal)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(sponge, be considered animals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(sponge, be classified as animal)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(sponge, be classified as animals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sponge, be classified as animal)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(sponge, be considered animals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(sponge, be classified as animal)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(sponge, be considered animals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(sponge, be classified as animal)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be considered animal)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(sponge, be classified as animal)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be considered animals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(sponge, be classified as animal)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(sponge, is animal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(sponge, be classified as animal)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(sponge, be classified as animal)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be classified as animal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sponge, be classified as animal)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(sponge, be classified as animal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be classified as animal)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(organism, is animal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be classified as animal)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(amoeba, be considered animals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(sponge, be classified as animal)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(organism, is animal)