sponge: be considered animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organism
Weight: 0.68
, object
Weight: 0.64
, material
Weight: 0.63
, creature
Weight: 0.62
Siblings yeast
Weight: 0.35
, starfish
Weight: 0.34
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.34
, giant squid
Weight: 0.34
, amoeba
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered animals 1.00
be considered as animals 0.98
be animals 0.93
be called animals 0.93
be called pore-bearing animals 0.93
be considered animal 0.93
is animals 0.93
be known as animals 0.91
be considered as form of animal 0.89
be referred to animals 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(amoeba, be considered animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(sponge, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(amoeba, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(amoeba, be considered animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(sponge, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(sponge, be considered animals)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(sponge, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sponge, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(sponge, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(sponge, be considered animal)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(sponge, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(sponge, be considered animal)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(sponge, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(sponge, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(sponge, be considered animal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(sponge, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sponge, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be referred to animals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(sponge, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(sponge, be referred to animals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sponge, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be considered animal)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(sponge, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(sponge, be referred to animals)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(sponge, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sponge, be referred to animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(sponge, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(sponge, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be considered animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(sponge, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(sponge, be considered animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(amoeba, be considered animals)