sponge: be considered animal

Related concepts

Parents	organism Weight: 0.68 , object Weight: 0.64 , material Weight: 0.63 , creature Weight: 0.62
Siblings	yeast Weight: 0.35 , starfish Weight: 0.34 , adhesive tape Weight: 0.34 , giant squid Weight: 0.34 , amoeba Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be considered animal	1.00
be considered as form of animal	0.95
is animal	0.94
be considered animals	0.93
be considered as animals	0.92
be considered complex animal	0.91
be classified as animal	0.89
be considered part of animal kingdom	0.89
be called animals	0.87
be called pore-bearing animals	0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(organism, is animal) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(sponge, be considered animal)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(sponge, be considered animal) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(organism, is animal)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(sponge, be considered animal) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(organism, is animal)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(sponge, be considered animal) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(amoeba, be considered animals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(organism, is animal) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(sponge, be considered animal) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(sponge, be considered animal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(sponge, be considered animal) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(amoeba, be considered animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(amoeba, be considered animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(sponge, be considered animal) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Salient(sponge, be considered animal)

Similarity expansion

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.28

Typical(sponge, be considered animal) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(sponge, is animal)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(sponge, be considered animal) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(sponge, be considered animals)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(sponge, be considered animal) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(sponge, is animal)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(sponge, be considered animal) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(sponge, be considered animal) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(sponge, be classified as animal)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(sponge, be considered animal) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(sponge, is animal)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.64

Salient(sponge, be considered animal) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Salient(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.64

Salient(sponge, be considered animal) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Salient(sponge, is animal)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.64

Salient(sponge, be considered animal) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(sponge, be considered animals)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(sponge, be considered animal) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.64

Salient(sponge, be considered animal) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(sponge, be classified as animal)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(sponge, be considered animal) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(sponge, be considered animals)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(sponge, be considered animal) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(sponge, be classified as animal)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.28

Typical(sponge, be considered animal) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.28

Typical(sponge, be considered animal) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(sponge, be considered animals)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.28

Typical(sponge, be considered animal) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(sponge, be classified as animal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

Salient(sponge, be considered animal) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(sponge, be considered animal) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(sponge, be considered animal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(sponge, be considered animal) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(sponge, be considered animal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(sponge, be considered animal) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(organism, is animal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(sponge, be considered animal) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(amoeba, be considered animals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.28

Typical(sponge, be considered animal) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(organism, is animal)