spoon: have holes in them

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents utensil
Weight: 0.74
, cooking utensil
Weight: 0.70
, spatula
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.62
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.62
Siblings wooden spoon
Weight: 0.70
, toaster oven
Weight: 0.37
, microwave oven
Weight: 0.36
, skillet
Weight: 0.36
, frying pan
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have holes in them 1.00
has physical part holes 0.89
have hole in middle 0.85
be left in hole 0.84
be left in hole in tree 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(spoon, have holes in them)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(item, be left in hole in tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(spoon, have holes in them)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(spoon, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(spatula, has physical part holes)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(spoon, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(item, be left in hole in tree)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(spoon, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(spatula, has physical part holes)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(spoon, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(item, be left in hole in tree)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(spoon, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, have hole in middle)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(spoon, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, has physical part holes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(spoon, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, have holes in them)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(spoon, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(spoon, have holes in them)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(item, be left in hole in tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(spoon, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(spoon, have holes in them)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(spoon, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(wooden spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(wooden spoon, has physical part holes)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(spoon, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(wooden spoon, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(wooden spoon, have holes in them)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(spoon, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(wooden spoon, have hole in middle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(wooden spoon, have hole in middle)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(spoon, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(spoon, have holes in them)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(spoon, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has physical part holes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(spoon, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(spoon, has physical part holes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(spoon, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(spoon, have hole in middle)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(spoon, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(spoon, has physical part holes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(spoon, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(spoon, have hole in middle)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(spoon, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(spoon, has physical part holes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(spoon, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(spoon, have hole in middle)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(spoon, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(spoon, have hole in middle)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(spoon, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(spoon, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(spoon, have holes in them)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(spoon, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(spoon, have holes in them)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(spoon, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(spatula, has physical part holes)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(spoon, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(item, be left in hole in tree)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(spoon, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(wooden spoon, has physical part holes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(spoon, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(wooden spoon, have hole in middle)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(spoon, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(wooden spoon, have holes in them)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(spoon, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(spatula, has physical part holes)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(spoon, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(item, be left in hole in tree)