spatula: has physical part holes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.67
, cooking utensil
Weight: 0.63
, utensil
Weight: 0.55
, instrument
Weight: 0.54
, tool
Weight: 0.54
Siblings spoon
Weight: 0.62
, wooden spoon
Weight: 0.38
, toaster oven
Weight: 0.36
, microwave oven
Weight: 0.36
, knife
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part holes 1.00
have holes in them 0.89
have hole in middle 0.83
has physical part grooves 0.77
has physical part ridges 0.77
has physical part pockets 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, has physical part holes)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has physical part holes)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(knife, has physical part holes)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, have hole in middle)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(knife, have holes in them)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, have holes in them)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(spoon, have hole in middle)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(spoon, have holes in them)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has physical part pockets)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(knife, has physical part ridges)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(knife, has physical part grooves)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(wooden spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(wooden spoon, has physical part holes)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(spoon, has physical part holes)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(knife, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(knife, has physical part holes)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(spoon, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(spoon, have holes in them)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(wooden spoon, have hole in middle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(wooden spoon, have hole in middle)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(knife, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(knife, have holes in them)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(wooden spoon, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(wooden spoon, have holes in them)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(spoon, have hole in middle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(spoon, have hole in middle)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(spoon, has physical part pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(spoon, has physical part pockets)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(knife, has physical part grooves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(knife, has physical part grooves)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(knife, has physical part ridges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(knife, has physical part ridges)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(spatula, has physical part holes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(spatula, has physical part holes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(spatula, has physical part holes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(wooden spoon, has physical part holes)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(spoon, has physical part holes)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(knife, has physical part holes)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(spoon, have holes in them)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(knife, have holes in them)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(wooden spoon, have hole in middle)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(wooden spoon, have holes in them)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(spoon, have hole in middle)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(spoon, has physical part pockets)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(knife, has physical part ridges)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(knife, has physical part grooves)