spoon: has physical part pockets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents utensil
Weight: 0.74
, cooking utensil
Weight: 0.70
, spatula
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.62
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.62
Siblings wooden spoon
Weight: 0.70
, toaster oven
Weight: 0.37
, microwave oven
Weight: 0.36
, skillet
Weight: 0.36
, frying pan
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part pockets 1.00
has physical part zones 0.77
has physical part holes 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(spoon, has physical part pockets)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(spoon, has physical part pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(spatula, has physical part holes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has physical part pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(spatula, has physical part holes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has physical part pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, has physical part holes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has physical part pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(frying pan, has physical part zones)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(spoon, has physical part pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(spoon, has physical part pockets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(spoon, has physical part pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(wooden spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(wooden spoon, has physical part holes)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(spoon, has physical part pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(frying pan, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(frying pan, has physical part zones)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(spoon, has physical part pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(spoon, has physical part pockets)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(spoon, has physical part pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(spoon, has physical part holes)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(spoon, has physical part pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(spoon, has physical part holes)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(spoon, has physical part pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(spoon, has physical part holes)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(spoon, has physical part pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has physical part holes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(spoon, has physical part pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(spoon, has physical part pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has physical part pockets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(spoon, has physical part pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(spoon, has physical part pockets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has physical part pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(spatula, has physical part holes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has physical part pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(wooden spoon, has physical part holes)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has physical part pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(frying pan, has physical part zones)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(spoon, has physical part pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(spatula, has physical part holes)