starbucks: be successful in past 40 years

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents store
Weight: 0.64
, brand
Weight: 0.63
, company
Weight: 0.62
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mcdonalds
Weight: 0.36
, pepsi
Weight: 0.35
, grocery store
Weight: 0.34
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.34
, convenience store
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be successful in past 40 years 1.00
is successful 0.82
operate for many years 0.79
operate for years 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(company, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(fast food restaurant, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(brand, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(brand, is successful)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, is successful)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(company, is successful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, is successful)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(brand, is successful)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(company, is successful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(convenience store, is successful)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, is successful)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is successful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(company, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(fast food restaurant, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(brand, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(mcdonalds, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, is successful)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(pepsi, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(pepsi, is successful)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(convenience store, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(convenience store, is successful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(starbucks, is successful)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(starbucks, is successful)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(starbucks, is successful)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(starbucks, operate for many years)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(starbucks, operate for many years)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(starbucks, operate for years)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(starbucks, operate for years)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(starbucks, operate for many years)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(starbucks, operate for years)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, operate for many years)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, is successful)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, operate for years)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(brand, is successful)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(company, is successful)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, is successful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, is successful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pepsi, is successful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(convenience store, is successful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(brand, is successful)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(company, is successful)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, is successful)