statistics: was used in ancient times

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, department
Weight: 0.62
, tool
Weight: 0.62
, field
Weight: 0.61
Siblings batting average
Weight: 0.69
, poll
Weight: 0.56
, era
Weight: 0.56
, batting
Weight: 0.52
, prevalence
Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property Similarity
was used in ancient times 1.00
was used in times 0.88
were invented in stone ages 0.77
have have used 0.76
is used for 0.76
is is used 0.76
be used 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(tool, were invented in stone ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(statistics, was used in ancient times)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(tool, have have used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(statistics, was used in ancient times)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(field, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(statistics, was used in ancient times)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(tool, is used for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(statistics, was used in ancient times)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(tool, is is used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(statistics, was used in ancient times)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(factor, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(statistics, was used in ancient times)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(statistics, was used in ancient times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(factor, be used)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(statistics, was used in ancient times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(tool, is is used)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(statistics, was used in ancient times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(tool, is used for)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(statistics, was used in ancient times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(tool, have have used)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(statistics, was used in ancient times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(field, be used)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(statistics, was used in ancient times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(tool, were invented in stone ages)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(statistics, was used in ancient times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(tool, were invented in stone ages)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(statistics, was used in ancient times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tool, have have used)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(statistics, was used in ancient times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(factor, be used)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(statistics, was used in ancient times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(field, be used)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(statistics, was used in ancient times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(tool, is used for)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(statistics, was used in ancient times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(tool, is is used)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(tool, were invented in stone ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(statistics, was used in ancient times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(statistics, was used in ancient times)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(tool, have have used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(statistics, was used in ancient times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(statistics, was used in ancient times)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(tool, is used for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(statistics, was used in ancient times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(statistics, was used in ancient times)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(field, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(statistics, was used in ancient times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(statistics, was used in ancient times)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(tool, is is used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(statistics, was used in ancient times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(statistics, was used in ancient times)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(factor, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(statistics, was used in ancient times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(statistics, was used in ancient times)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(statistics, was used in ancient times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(statistics, was used in ancient times)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(statistics, was used in ancient times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(statistics, be used)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(statistics, was used in ancient times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(statistics, be used)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(statistics, was used in ancient times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(statistics, be used)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(statistics, was used in ancient times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(statistics, be used)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(statistics, was used in ancient times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(statistics, was used in ancient times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(statistics, was used in ancient times)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(statistics, was used in ancient times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(statistics, was used in ancient times)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(statistics, was used in ancient times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(factor, be used)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(statistics, was used in ancient times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(tool, is is used)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(statistics, was used in ancient times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(tool, is used for)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(statistics, was used in ancient times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(field, be used)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(statistics, was used in ancient times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(tool, have have used)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(statistics, was used in ancient times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tool, were invented in stone ages)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(statistics, was used in ancient times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(factor, be used)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(statistics, was used in ancient times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(tool, is is used)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(statistics, was used in ancient times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(tool, is used for)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(statistics, was used in ancient times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(field, be used)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(statistics, was used in ancient times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(tool, have have used)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(statistics, was used in ancient times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tool, were invented in stone ages)