tool: were invented in stone ages

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.65
, gift
Weight: 0.62
, mechanism
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.61
Siblings metaphor
Weight: 0.71
, task force
Weight: 0.69
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.69
, free software
Weight: 0.69
, calculator
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
were invented in stone ages 1.00
were invented 0.81
was invented 0.78
is invented 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(tool, were invented in stone ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(calculator, were invented)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(tool, were invented in stone ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(calculator, was invented)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(tool, were invented in stone ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(calculator, is invented)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(tool, were invented in stone ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(calculator, were invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(calculator, were invented)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(tool, were invented in stone ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(calculator, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(calculator, was invented)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(tool, were invented in stone ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(calculator, is invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(calculator, is invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(tool, were invented in stone ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(tool, were invented in stone ages)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(tool, were invented in stone ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(tool, were invented)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(tool, were invented in stone ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(tool, were invented)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(tool, were invented in stone ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(tool, were invented)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(tool, were invented in stone ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(tool, is invented)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(tool, were invented in stone ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(tool, is invented)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(tool, were invented in stone ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(tool, is invented)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(tool, were invented in stone ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tool, were invented)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(tool, were invented in stone ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tool, is invented)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(tool, were invented in stone ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tool, were invented in stone ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(tool, were invented in stone ages)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(tool, were invented in stone ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tool, were invented in stone ages)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(tool, were invented in stone ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(calculator, were invented)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(tool, were invented in stone ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(calculator, was invented)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(tool, were invented in stone ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(calculator, is invented)