status: be determined in european

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents value
Weight: 0.64
, issue
Weight: 0.62
, condition
Weight: 0.61
, privilege
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings citizenship
Weight: 0.32
, integrity
Weight: 0.32
, loyalty
Weight: 0.32
, real number
Weight: 0.32
, rank
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be determined in european 1.00
was determined in latin america 0.84
be determined etc 0.80
was determined in colonial latin america 0.80
be in canada identified as indian 0.80
be in germany 0.79
were in germany 0.79
were in germany bad 0.78
were in japan different from conditions in germany 0.78
were for african americans difficult 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(condition, were in japan different from conditions in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(status, be determined in european)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(condition, were for african americans difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(status, be determined in european)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(status, be determined in european) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(condition, were for african americans difficult)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(status, be determined in european) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(condition, were in japan different from conditions in germany)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(status, be determined in european) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(condition, were for african americans difficult)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(status, be determined in european) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(condition, were in japan different from conditions in germany)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(condition, were in japan different from conditions in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(status, be determined in european) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(status, be determined in european)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(condition, were for african americans difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(status, be determined in european) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(status, be determined in european)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(status, be determined in european) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(status, be determined in european)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(status, be determined in european) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(status, was determined in latin america)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(status, be determined in european) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(status, was determined in latin america)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(status, be determined in european) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(status, was determined in latin america)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(status, be determined in european) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(status, was determined in colonial latin america)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(status, be determined in european) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(status, be in canada identified as indian)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(status, be determined in european) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(status, was determined in colonial latin america)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(status, be determined in european) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(status, was determined in colonial latin america)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(status, be determined in european) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(status, be in canada identified as indian)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(status, be determined in european) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(status, be in canada identified as indian)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(status, be determined in european) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(status, was determined in latin america)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(status, be determined in european) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(status, be in canada identified as indian)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(status, be determined in european) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(status, was determined in colonial latin america)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(status, be determined in european) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(status, be determined in european) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(status, be determined in european)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(status, be determined in european) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(status, be determined in european)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(status, be determined in european) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(condition, were for african americans difficult)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(status, be determined in european) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(condition, were in japan different from conditions in germany)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(status, be determined in european) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(condition, were for african americans difficult)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(status, be determined in european) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(condition, were in japan different from conditions in germany)