status: was determined in latin america

Related concepts

Parents	value Weight: 0.64 , issue Weight: 0.62 , condition Weight: 0.61 , privilege Weight: 0.60 , factor Weight: 0.60
Siblings	citizenship Weight: 0.32 , integrity Weight: 0.32 , loyalty Weight: 0.32 , real number Weight: 0.32 , rank Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
was determined in latin america	1.00
was determined in colonial latin america	0.93
be determined in european	0.84
were for african americans	0.82
exist in america	0.82
were for african americans difficult	0.81
be in canada identified as indian	0.80
be such problem in america	0.80
be in usa work	0.79
were for japanese americans	0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(condition, were for african americans difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(status, was determined in latin america)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(issue, be such problem in america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(status, was determined in latin america)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(condition, were for japanese americans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(status, was determined in latin america)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(privilege, exist in america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(status, was determined in latin america)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(status, was determined in latin america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(privilege, exist in america)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(status, was determined in latin america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(condition, were for japanese americans)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(status, was determined in latin america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(condition, were for african americans difficult)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(status, was determined in latin america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(issue, be such problem in america)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(status, was determined in latin america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(privilege, exist in america)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(status, was determined in latin america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(condition, were for japanese americans)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(status, was determined in latin america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(condition, were for african americans difficult)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(status, was determined in latin america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(issue, be such problem in america)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(condition, were for african americans difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(status, was determined in latin america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(status, was determined in latin america)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(issue, be such problem in america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(status, was determined in latin america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(status, was determined in latin america)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(condition, were for japanese americans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(status, was determined in latin america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(status, was determined in latin america)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(privilege, exist in america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(status, was determined in latin america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(status, was determined in latin america)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(status, was determined in latin america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(status, was determined in latin america)

Similarity expansion

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(status, was determined in latin america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(status, was determined in colonial latin america)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(status, was determined in latin america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(status, was determined in colonial latin america)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(status, was determined in latin america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Salient(status, be in usa work)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(status, was determined in latin america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(status, was determined in colonial latin america)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(status, was determined in latin america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(status, be in usa work)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(status, was determined in latin america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(status, was determined in colonial latin america)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(status, was determined in latin america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(status, be in usa work)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(status, was determined in latin america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(status, be determined in european)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(status, was determined in latin america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(status, be in canada identified as indian)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(status, was determined in latin america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(status, be in usa work)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(status, was determined in latin america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(status, be determined in european)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(status, was determined in latin america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(status, be determined in european)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(status, was determined in latin america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(status, be determined in european)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(status, was determined in latin america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(status, be in canada identified as indian)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(status, was determined in latin america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(status, be in canada identified as indian)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(status, was determined in latin america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(status, be in canada identified as indian)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(status, was determined in latin america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(status, was determined in latin america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(status, was determined in latin america)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(status, was determined in latin america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(status, was determined in latin america)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(status, was determined in latin america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(privilege, exist in america)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(status, was determined in latin america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(issue, be such problem in america)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(status, was determined in latin america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(condition, were for japanese americans)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(status, was determined in latin america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(condition, were for african americans difficult)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(status, was determined in latin america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(privilege, exist in america)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(status, was determined in latin america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(issue, be such problem in america)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(status, was determined in latin america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(condition, were for african americans difficult)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(status, was determined in latin america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(condition, were for japanese americans)