status: be important to person

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents value
Weight: 0.64
, issue
Weight: 0.62
, condition
Weight: 0.61
, matter
Weight: 0.59
, concern
Weight: 0.58
Siblings integrity
Weight: 0.32
, loyalty
Weight: 0.32
, identity
Weight: 0.31
, trust
Weight: 0.31
, origin
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to person 1.00
be important in workplace 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(status, be important to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(integrity, be important in workplace)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(status, be important to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(trust, be important in workplace)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(status, be important to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(identity, be important to person)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(status, be important to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(identity, be important to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(identity, be important to person)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(status, be important to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(trust, be important in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(trust, be important in workplace)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(status, be important to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(integrity, be important in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(integrity, be important in workplace)

Salient implies Plausible

0.11
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(status, be important to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(status, be important to person)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(status, be important to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(status, be important to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(status, be important to person)

Typical implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(status, be important to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(status, be important to person)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(status, be important to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(identity, be important to person)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(status, be important to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(trust, be important in workplace)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(status, be important to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(integrity, be important in workplace)