steak: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.74
, entree
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.60
, favorite
Weight: 0.58
Siblings filet
Weight: 0.72
, flank
Weight: 0.43
, fillet
Weight: 0.43
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.39
, potato salad
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
get expensive 0.94
is expensive now 0.94
get more expensive 0.90
be in market expensive 0.86
is cheaper 0.85
be much more costly today 0.84
have more expensive than in 1933 today 0.84
be on cheaper 0.83
be sold cheaper 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(steak, is expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(steak, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(item, be much more costly today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(steak, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(steak, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(item, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(steak, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(item, be much more costly today)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(steak, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(steak, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(item, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(steak, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(steak, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(item, be much more costly today)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(steak, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(steak, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(steak, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(steak, is expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(item, be much more costly today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(steak, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(steak, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(steak, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(steak, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(steak, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(steak, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(steak, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(steak, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(steak, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(steak, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(item, be much more costly today)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(steak, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(steak, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(steak, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(steak, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(item, be much more costly today)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(steak, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)