straw: hurt environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents residue
Weight: 0.59
, material
Weight: 0.58
, substance
Weight: 0.57
, fuel
Weight: 0.57
Siblings proboscis
Weight: 0.33
, steel wool
Weight: 0.33
, burlap
Weight: 0.32
, paper towel
Weight: 0.32
, plastic wrap
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
hurt environment 1.00
harm environment 0.86
be bad for environment 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fuel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(straw, hurt environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(straw, hurt environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(fuel, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(straw, hurt environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(straw, hurt environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(straw, hurt environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fuel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(straw, hurt environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(straw, hurt environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(straw, hurt environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(paper towel, be bad for environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(straw, hurt environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(straw, hurt environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(straw, hurt environment)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(straw, hurt environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(straw, harm environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(straw, hurt environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(straw, harm environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(straw, hurt environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(straw, harm environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(straw, hurt environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(straw, harm environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(straw, hurt environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(straw, be bad for environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(straw, hurt environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(straw, be bad for environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(straw, hurt environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(straw, be bad for environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(straw, hurt environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(straw, be bad for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(straw, hurt environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(straw, hurt environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(straw, hurt environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(straw, hurt environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(straw, hurt environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(straw, hurt environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(fuel, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(straw, hurt environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(paper towel, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(straw, hurt environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(straw, hurt environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(fuel, be bad for environment)