stretch: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents part
Weight: 0.53
, area
Weight: 0.52
, option
Weight: 0.49
, factor
Weight: 0.49
Siblings leg
Weight: 0.59
, west point
Weight: 0.31
, zone
Weight: 0.31
, south park
Weight: 0.31
, shoreline
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
feel good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(stretch, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(south park, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(stretch, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(zone, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(stretch, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(south park, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(stretch, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(south park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(south park, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(stretch, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(zone, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(zone, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(stretch, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(south park, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(south park, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(stretch, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(stretch, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(stretch, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(stretch, has quality good)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(stretch, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(stretch, has quality good)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(stretch, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(stretch, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(stretch, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(stretch, feel good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(stretch, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(stretch, feel good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(stretch, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(stretch, feel good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(stretch, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(stretch, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(stretch, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(stretch, feel good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(stretch, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(stretch, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(stretch, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(stretch, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(stretch, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(stretch, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(south park, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(stretch, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(zone, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(stretch, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(south park, has quality good)