study: is critical

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents evaluation
Weight: 0.64
, journal
Weight: 0.64
, treatment
Weight: 0.60
, indicator
Weight: 0.60
Siblings report
Weight: 0.66
, cost benefit analysis
Weight: 0.64
, astronomy
Weight: 0.62
, proportion
Weight: 0.61
, literature
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
is critical 1.00
be important to mayans 0.81
be important today 0.76
be essential at phase 0.75
be important to management 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(evaluation, be essential at phase) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(study, is critical)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(study, is critical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(evaluation, be essential at phase)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(study, is critical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(study, is critical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be important to mayans)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(study, is critical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be important today)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(study, is critical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(literature, be important today)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(study, is critical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(report, be important to management)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(evaluation, be essential at phase) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(study, is critical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(study, is critical)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(study, is critical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(astronomy, be important to mayans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(astronomy, be important to mayans)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(study, is critical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(literature, be important today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(literature, be important today)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(study, is critical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(report, be important to management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(report, be important to management)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(study, is critical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(astronomy, be important today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(astronomy, be important today)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(study, is critical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(study, is critical)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(study, is critical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(study, is critical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(study, is critical)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(study, is critical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(study, is critical)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(study, is critical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(evaluation, be essential at phase)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(study, is critical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(astronomy, be important to mayans)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(study, is critical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(literature, be important today)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(study, is critical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(report, be important to management)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(study, is critical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(astronomy, be important today)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(study, is critical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(evaluation, be essential at phase)