sub: be underdeveloped africa

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food
Weight: 0.53
, right
Weight: 0.52
, place
Weight: 0.51
, speaker
Weight: 0.50
Siblings boomer
Weight: 0.46
, other place
Weight: 0.31
, chinese food
Weight: 0.30
, section
Weight: 0.30
, west point
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be underdeveloped saharan africa 1.00
be underdeveloped africa 1.00
be saharan africa region 0.86
be saharan africa in poverty 0.83
be saharan africa in stage 2 0.81
civilizations of were africa located 0.79
civilizations of were saharan africa located 0.79
civilizations of were africa 0.78
civilizations of were saharan africa 0.78
civilizations of were saharan africa located on coast 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(sub, be underdeveloped africa)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(sub, be underdeveloped saharan africa)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(sub, be underdeveloped saharan africa)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(sub, be underdeveloped saharan africa)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sub, be underdeveloped saharan africa)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(sub, be saharan africa region)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(sub, be saharan africa region)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(sub, be saharan africa in poverty)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(sub, be saharan africa region)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located on coast)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(sub, be saharan africa in stage 2)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located on coast)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(sub, civilizations of were africa located)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(sub, civilizations of were africa located)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located on coast)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(sub, civilizations of were africa)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(sub, civilizations of were africa located)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(sub, be saharan africa in poverty)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(sub, civilizations of were africa)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sub, be saharan africa in poverty)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(sub, be saharan africa in poverty)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(sub, civilizations of were africa)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(sub, be saharan africa in stage 2)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(sub, be saharan africa in stage 2)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sub, be saharan africa region)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(sub, be saharan africa in stage 2)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(sub, civilizations of were africa located)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(sub, civilizations of were africa)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located on coast)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sub, be underdeveloped africa)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(sub, be underdeveloped africa)