sub: civilizations of were saharan africa located

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food
Weight: 0.53
, right
Weight: 0.52
, place
Weight: 0.51
, speaker
Weight: 0.50
Siblings boomer
Weight: 0.46
, other place
Weight: 0.31
, chinese food
Weight: 0.30
, section
Weight: 0.30
, west point
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
civilizations of were africa located 1.00
civilizations of were saharan africa located 1.00
civilizations of were africa 0.96
civilizations of were saharan africa 0.96
civilizations of were saharan africa located on coast 0.96
civilizations of were africa located on coast 0.96
be saharan africa region 0.82
be underdeveloped saharan africa 0.79
be underdeveloped africa 0.79
be saharan africa in stage 2 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(sub, civilizations of were africa located)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(sub, civilizations of were africa)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located on coast)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sub, civilizations of were africa located on coast)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located on coast)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located on coast)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(sub, civilizations of were africa located on coast)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(sub, civilizations of were africa located on coast)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sub, be saharan africa region)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(sub, civilizations of were africa located)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located on coast)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(sub, civilizations of were africa located on coast)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sub, be underdeveloped saharan africa)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(sub, be saharan africa in stage 2)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(sub, civilizations of were africa)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(sub, civilizations of were africa located)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(sub, civilizations of were africa located)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(sub, civilizations of were africa)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(sub, be saharan africa region)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(sub, civilizations of were africa)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(sub, be underdeveloped saharan africa)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(sub, be saharan africa region)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(sub, be saharan africa in stage 2)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(sub, be saharan africa region)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(sub, be underdeveloped saharan africa)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(sub, be saharan africa in stage 2)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(sub, be underdeveloped saharan africa)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(sub, be saharan africa in stage 2)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)