sub: civilizations of were saharan africa

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food
Weight: 0.53
, right
Weight: 0.52
, place
Weight: 0.51
, speaker
Weight: 0.50
Siblings boomer
Weight: 0.46
, other place
Weight: 0.31
, chinese food
Weight: 0.30
, section
Weight: 0.30
, west point
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
civilizations of were africa 1.00
civilizations of were saharan africa 1.00
civilizations of were africa located 0.96
civilizations of were saharan africa located 0.96
civilizations of were saharan africa located on coast 0.92
civilizations of were africa located on coast 0.92
be saharan africa region 0.83
be saharan africa in poverty 0.78
be underdeveloped saharan africa 0.78
be underdeveloped africa 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(sub, civilizations of were africa)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(sub, civilizations of were africa located)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(sub, civilizations of were africa)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located on coast)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sub, civilizations of were africa located on coast)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located on coast)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(sub, civilizations of were africa located)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(sub, civilizations of were africa located on coast)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located on coast)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(sub, civilizations of were africa located on coast)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa located on coast)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(sub, civilizations of were africa located)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(sub, civilizations of were africa located on coast)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(sub, civilizations of were africa)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(sub, civilizations of were africa located)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(sub, civilizations of were africa)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sub, be saharan africa region)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(sub, be saharan africa in poverty)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sub, be underdeveloped saharan africa)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(sub, be saharan africa region)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(sub, be saharan africa in poverty)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(sub, be saharan africa region)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(sub, be underdeveloped saharan africa)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(sub, be saharan africa region)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(sub, be saharan africa in poverty)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(sub, be underdeveloped saharan africa)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sub, be saharan africa in poverty)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(sub, be underdeveloped africa)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(sub, be underdeveloped saharan africa)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(sub, civilizations of were saharan africa)