subway: get more expensive

Related concepts

Parents	restaurant Weight: 0.61 , place Weight: 0.59 , fast food restaurant Weight: 0.59 , franchise Weight: 0.58 , convenience store Weight: 0.58
Siblings	deli Weight: 0.33 , bus stop Weight: 0.33 , sidewalk Weight: 0.32 , elevator Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
get more expensive	1.00
is expensive	0.90
be better than mcdonalds	0.77
have more restaurants than macas	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(subway, get more expensive)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(convenience store, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(subway, get more expensive)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(franchise, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(subway, get more expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(subway, get more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(franchise, is expensive)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(subway, get more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(convenience store, is expensive)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(subway, get more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Plausible(restaurant, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(subway, get more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(franchise, is expensive)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(subway, get more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, is expensive)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(subway, get more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(convenience store, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(subway, get more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(deli, is expensive)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(subway, get more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(elevator, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

Remarkable(subway, get more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(subway, get more expensive)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(convenience store, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

Remarkable(subway, get more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(subway, get more expensive)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(franchise, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

Remarkable(subway, get more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(subway, get more expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(subway, get more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(elevator, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(elevator, is expensive)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(subway, get more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(deli, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(deli, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(subway, get more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(subway, get more expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(subway, get more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(subway, is expensive)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(subway, get more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(subway, is expensive)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(subway, get more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(subway, is expensive)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(subway, get more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(subway, be better than mcdonalds)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(subway, get more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Salient(subway, have more restaurants than macas)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(subway, get more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Salient(subway, be better than mcdonalds)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(subway, get more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Plausible(subway, have more restaurants than macas)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(subway, get more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(subway, have more restaurants than macas)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.47

Remarkable(subway, get more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(subway, have more restaurants than macas)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(subway, get more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(subway, be better than mcdonalds)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.47

Remarkable(subway, get more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(subway, be better than mcdonalds)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.47

Remarkable(subway, get more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(subway, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(subway, get more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(subway, get more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(subway, get more expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(subway, get more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(subway, get more expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(subway, get more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(franchise, is expensive)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(subway, get more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(convenience store, is expensive)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(subway, get more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(restaurant, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(subway, get more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(deli, is expensive)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(subway, get more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(elevator, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(subway, get more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(franchise, is expensive)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(subway, get more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(convenience store, is expensive)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(subway, get more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(restaurant, is expensive)