sugar: be a part of candy

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents raw material
Weight: 0.67
, dairy product
Weight: 0.66
, substance
Weight: 0.61
, food
Weight: 0.60
Siblings syrup
Weight: 0.65
, glucose
Weight: 0.62
, glycerol
Weight: 0.62
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.38
, chocolate
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be a part of candy 1.00
be at candy store 0.94
be at candy bar 0.90
be at soda pop 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sugar, be a part of candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be at candy store)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sugar, be a part of candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(chocolate, be at candy store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(chocolate, be at candy store)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sugar, be a part of candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(sugar, be a part of candy)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(sugar, be a part of candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(sugar, be at candy bar)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(sugar, be a part of candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(sugar, be at candy bar)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sugar, be a part of candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(sugar, be at candy bar)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(sugar, be a part of candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(sugar, be at soda pop)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(sugar, be a part of candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(sugar, be at soda pop)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(sugar, be a part of candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(sugar, be at candy bar)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sugar, be a part of candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(sugar, be at soda pop)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(sugar, be a part of candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(sugar, be at soda pop)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(sugar, be a part of candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(sugar, be a part of candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sugar, be a part of candy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sugar, be a part of candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(sugar, be a part of candy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sugar, be a part of candy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(chocolate, be at candy store)