sugar: be at candy bar

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents raw material
Weight: 0.67
, dairy product
Weight: 0.66
, substance
Weight: 0.61
, food
Weight: 0.60
Siblings syrup
Weight: 0.65
, glucose
Weight: 0.62
, glycerol
Weight: 0.62
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.38
, chocolate
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at candy bar 1.00
be at candy store 0.92
be a part of candy 0.90
be at soda pop 0.78
be at pizza 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(food, be at pizza)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(sugar, be at candy bar)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(sugar, be at candy bar)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(food, be at pizza)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(sugar, be at candy bar)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(food, be at pizza)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(sugar, be at candy bar)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be at candy store)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(food, be at pizza)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(sugar, be at candy bar)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(sugar, be at candy bar)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(sugar, be at candy bar)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(chocolate, be at candy store)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(chocolate, be at candy store)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(sugar, be at candy bar)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(sugar, be at candy bar)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(sugar, be at candy bar)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(sugar, be a part of candy)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(sugar, be at candy bar)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sugar, be a part of candy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(sugar, be at candy bar)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(sugar, be a part of candy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(sugar, be at candy bar)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(sugar, be at soda pop)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(sugar, be at candy bar)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(sugar, be at soda pop)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(sugar, be at candy bar)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(sugar, be a part of candy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(sugar, be at candy bar)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(sugar, be at soda pop)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(sugar, be at candy bar)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(sugar, be at soda pop)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(sugar, be at candy bar)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(sugar, be at candy bar)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(sugar, be at candy bar)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(sugar, be at candy bar)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(sugar, be at candy bar)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(sugar, be at candy bar)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(food, be at pizza)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(sugar, be at candy bar)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(chocolate, be at candy store)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(sugar, be at candy bar)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(food, be at pizza)