sugar: be at soda pop

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents raw material
Weight: 0.67
, dairy product
Weight: 0.66
, substance
Weight: 0.61
, food
Weight: 0.60
Siblings syrup
Weight: 0.65
, glucose
Weight: 0.62
, glycerol
Weight: 0.62
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.38
, chocolate
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at soda pop 1.00
be at candy bar 0.78
be at candy store 0.78
be a part of candy 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(sugar, be at soda pop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be at candy store)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sugar, be at soda pop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(chocolate, be at candy store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(chocolate, be at candy store)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sugar, be at soda pop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(sugar, be at soda pop)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(sugar, be at soda pop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(sugar, be at candy bar)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(sugar, be at soda pop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(sugar, be at candy bar)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(sugar, be at soda pop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(sugar, be a part of candy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(sugar, be at soda pop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(sugar, be at candy bar)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sugar, be at soda pop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(sugar, be at candy bar)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(sugar, be at soda pop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sugar, be a part of candy)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sugar, be at soda pop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(sugar, be a part of candy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(sugar, be at soda pop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(sugar, be a part of candy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(sugar, be at soda pop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(sugar, be at soda pop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(sugar, be at soda pop)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sugar, be at soda pop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(sugar, be at soda pop)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(sugar, be at soda pop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(chocolate, be at candy store)