sugar: be at resturant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents raw material
Weight: 0.67
, dairy product
Weight: 0.66
, substance
Weight: 0.61
, food
Weight: 0.60
Siblings syrup
Weight: 0.65
, glucose
Weight: 0.62
, glycerol
Weight: 0.62
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.38
, chocolate
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at resturant 1.00
be at fast-food restaurant 0.85
be at restaurant 0.85
be at in restaurant 0.84
be find in restaurant 0.82
be serve at restaurant 0.77
be purchase in pizzeria 0.77
be serve in restaurant 0.76
be available in restaurant 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(sugar, be at resturant)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(sugar, be at resturant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(sugar, be at resturant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(sugar, be at resturant)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(food, be serve in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(sugar, be at resturant)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(food, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(sugar, be at resturant)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(sugar, be at resturant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(food, be at resturant)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(food, be available in restaurant)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(food, be serve in restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(food, be at resturant)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(food, be available in restaurant)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(food, be at in restaurant)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(food, be at restaurant)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(food, be at restaurant)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(food, be serve in restaurant)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(food, be at fast-food restaurant)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(food, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(sugar, be at resturant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(sugar, be at resturant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(sugar, be at resturant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(sugar, be at resturant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(sugar, be at resturant)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(food, be serve in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(sugar, be at resturant)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(sugar, be at resturant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(sugar, be at resturant)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(sugar, be at restaurant)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(sugar, be at restaurant)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(sugar, be at restaurant)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(sugar, be at restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(sugar, be at resturant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(sugar, be at resturant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(food, be at in restaurant)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(food, be at resturant)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(food, be serve in restaurant)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(food, be available in restaurant)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(food, be at resturant)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(food, be at in restaurant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(food, be serve in restaurant)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(sugar, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(food, be available in restaurant)