supplier: jobs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vendor
Weight: 0.61
, competitor
Weight: 0.60
, contractor
Weight: 0.60
, third party
Weight: 0.60
, warranty
Weight: 0.58
Siblings macromedia
Weight: 0.42
, distributor
Weight: 0.35
, software company
Weight: 0.34
, seller
Weight: 0.33
, shipper
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
jobs 1.00
has state jobs 0.94
hire time workers people 0.79
hire time workers 0.79
has state job 0.78
hire full time workers people 0.77
hire full time workers 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(contractor, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(supplier, jobs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(contractor, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(supplier, jobs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(contractor, hire full time workers people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(supplier, jobs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(supplier, jobs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(contractor, hire time workers people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(supplier, jobs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(contractor, hire full time workers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(supplier, jobs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(contractor, hire time workers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(supplier, jobs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(contractor, jobs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(contractor, hire time workers)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(contractor, hire time workers people)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(contractor, has state jobs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(contractor, has state job)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(contractor, hire full time workers people)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(contractor, hire full time workers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(contractor, has state jobs)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(contractor, hire full time workers)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(contractor, hire full time workers people)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(contractor, has state job)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(contractor, hire time workers people)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(contractor, hire time workers)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(contractor, jobs)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(software company, has state jobs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(contractor, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(supplier, jobs)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(contractor, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(supplier, jobs)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(contractor, hire time workers people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(supplier, jobs)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(contractor, hire time workers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(supplier, jobs)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(supplier, jobs)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(contractor, hire full time workers people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(supplier, jobs)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(contractor, hire full time workers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(supplier, jobs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(software company, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(software company, has state jobs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(supplier, jobs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(supplier, jobs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(supplier, jobs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(contractor, jobs)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(contractor, hire time workers)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(contractor, hire time workers people)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(contractor, has state job)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(contractor, has state jobs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(contractor, hire full time workers people)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(contractor, hire full time workers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(software company, has state jobs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(contractor, jobs)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(contractor, hire time workers)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(contractor, hire time workers people)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(contractor, has state job)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(contractor, has state jobs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(contractor, hire full time workers people)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(supplier, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(contractor, hire full time workers)