surgery: is dangerous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surgical procedure
Weight: 0.59
, treatment
Weight: 0.59
, intervention
Weight: 0.58
, cause
Weight: 0.57
, hospital care
Weight: 0.57
Siblings hysterectomy
Weight: 0.76
, plastic surgery
Weight: 0.70
, appendectomy
Weight: 0.66
, tonsillectomy
Weight: 0.64
, hip
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
is dangerous 1.00
was dangerous at start 0.85
be dangerous for adults 0.82
be more dangerous for adults 0.80
be harmful 0.78
is scary 0.78
was dangerous at start of century 0.78
was dangerous at start of 19th century 0.78
is fracture dangerous 0.76
be harmful to home 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(cause, be harmful to home)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(surgery, is dangerous)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(cause, be harmful)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(surgery, is dangerous)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(cause, be harmful)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(cause, be harmful to home)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(cause, be harmful to home)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cause, be harmful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, is dangerous)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(plastic surgery, is dangerous)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(tonsillectomy, be more dangerous for adults)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(tonsillectomy, is dangerous)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tonsillectomy, be dangerous for adults)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(cause, be harmful to home)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(surgery, is dangerous)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(cause, be harmful)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(surgery, is dangerous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(tonsillectomy, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(tonsillectomy, is dangerous)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(plastic surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(plastic surgery, is dangerous)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(hysterectomy, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(hysterectomy, is dangerous)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(tonsillectomy, be dangerous for adults)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(tonsillectomy, be dangerous for adults)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(tonsillectomy, be more dangerous for adults)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(tonsillectomy, be more dangerous for adults)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(surgery, is dangerous)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(surgery, was dangerous at start)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(surgery, was dangerous at start)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(surgery, was dangerous at start)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was dangerous at start)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(surgery, was dangerous at start of 19th century)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(surgery, was dangerous at start of 19th century)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was dangerous at start of 19th century)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(surgery, was dangerous at start of 19th century)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(surgery, is scary)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(surgery, is scary)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(surgery, is scary)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(surgery, is scary)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(surgery, is dangerous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(surgery, is dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(cause, be harmful)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(cause, be harmful to home)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(hysterectomy, is dangerous)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(tonsillectomy, is dangerous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(plastic surgery, is dangerous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tonsillectomy, be more dangerous for adults)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(tonsillectomy, be dangerous for adults)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(cause, be harmful)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(cause, be harmful to home)