surgery: was dangerous at start of century

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surgical procedure
Weight: 0.59
, treatment
Weight: 0.59
, intervention
Weight: 0.58
, cause
Weight: 0.57
, hospital care
Weight: 0.57
Siblings hysterectomy
Weight: 0.76
, plastic surgery
Weight: 0.70
, appendectomy
Weight: 0.66
, tonsillectomy
Weight: 0.64
, hip
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
was dangerous at start of century 1.00
was dangerous at start of 19th century 1.00
was dangerous at start 0.88
is dangerous 0.78
be important in history 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cause, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(cause, be important in history)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(cause, be important in history)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, is dangerous)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(plastic surgery, is dangerous)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(tonsillectomy, is dangerous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cause, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(tonsillectomy, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(tonsillectomy, is dangerous)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(plastic surgery, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(plastic surgery, is dangerous)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(hysterectomy, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(hysterectomy, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was dangerous at start of 19th century)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(surgery, was dangerous at start of 19th century)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(surgery, was dangerous at start of 19th century)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(surgery, was dangerous at start of 19th century)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was dangerous at start)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(surgery, was dangerous at start)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(surgery, was dangerous at start)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(surgery, was dangerous at start)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(surgery, is dangerous)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(surgery, is dangerous)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(surgery, is dangerous)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(surgery, is dangerous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cause, be important in history)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(hysterectomy, is dangerous)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(tonsillectomy, is dangerous)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(plastic surgery, is dangerous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(surgery, was dangerous at start of century)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cause, be important in history)