swamp: be used to hunt frog

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents obstacle
Weight: 0.58
, environment
Weight: 0.55
, fresh water
Weight: 0.54
, shallow water
Weight: 0.53
, name
Weight: 0.51
Siblings sea water
Weight: 0.33
, river
Weight: 0.33
, marsh
Weight: 0.33
, pond
Weight: 0.32
, waterfall
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to hunt frog 1.00
be used to frog to live in 0.91
be used to frog tank 0.84
be used to bird to live in 0.78
be habitat for fish 0.78
be full of duck and fish 0.78
be used to fish 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(shallow water, be used to frog tank)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(swamp, be used to hunt frog)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(shallow water, be used to fish)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(swamp, be used to hunt frog)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(swamp, be used to hunt frog)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(shallow water, be used to frog tank)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(swamp, be used to hunt frog)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(shallow water, be used to fish)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be used to hunt frog)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(shallow water, be used to frog tank)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be used to hunt frog)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(shallow water, be used to fish)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be used to hunt frog)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be used to frog to live in)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be used to hunt frog)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be used to bird to live in)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be used to hunt frog)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(river, be used to fish)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be used to hunt frog)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pond, be full of duck and fish)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be used to hunt frog)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(pond, be habitat for fish)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be used to hunt frog)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pond, be used to fish)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(shallow water, be used to frog tank)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(swamp, be used to hunt frog)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(swamp, be used to hunt frog)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(shallow water, be used to fish)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(swamp, be used to hunt frog)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(swamp, be used to hunt frog)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(swamp, be used to hunt frog)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(marsh, be used to frog to live in)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(marsh, be used to frog to live in)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(swamp, be used to hunt frog)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(pond, be full of duck and fish)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(pond, be full of duck and fish)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(swamp, be used to hunt frog)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(marsh, be used to bird to live in)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(marsh, be used to bird to live in)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(swamp, be used to hunt frog)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(pond, be habitat for fish)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(pond, be habitat for fish)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(swamp, be used to hunt frog)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pond, be used to fish)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(pond, be used to fish)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(swamp, be used to hunt frog)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(river, be used to fish)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(river, be used to fish)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(swamp, be used to hunt frog)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(swamp, be used to hunt frog)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(swamp, be used to hunt frog)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(swamp, be used to hunt frog)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be used to hunt frog)

Typical implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(swamp, be used to hunt frog)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(swamp, be used to hunt frog)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be used to hunt frog)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(shallow water, be used to frog tank)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be used to hunt frog)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(shallow water, be used to fish)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be used to hunt frog)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(marsh, be used to frog to live in)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be used to hunt frog)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(pond, be habitat for fish)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be used to hunt frog)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(marsh, be used to bird to live in)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be used to hunt frog)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pond, be used to fish)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be used to hunt frog)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(pond, be full of duck and fish)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be used to hunt frog)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(river, be used to fish)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(swamp, be used to hunt frog)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(shallow water, be used to frog tank)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(swamp, be used to hunt frog)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(shallow water, be used to fish)